
No love for SEO this "valentines day"
Officially recognised holiday’s and days of celebration, as we all know, are a major event for commercial marketers aiming to position their product/service/experience as THE ideal gift for the given holiday. However, as I noted in December, the big (largely currently struggling for enough sales) retail companies seem to shun undertaking any targeted online search promotion for these events. And at this time of year, it’s Valentine’s Day’s turn to be snubbed.

Keyword search results on Google for Valentines Day related terms
A quick look at Google’s AdWords keyword tool (keeping it Google since it’s the SE I’m looking at), suggests there were 40,500 searches in the UK for the term “valentines day” alone and that AdWords competition for the term is “full green bar”, so somewhat competitive then! However, a look at the top 10 results for “valentines day” in Google brings up a set of organic search results notably devoid of any major retailers.
With online sales having increased dramatically (in the UK) in the last 2 months, and online advertising spend now over £2billion (only 2-3% behind television and print advertising spend and growing), it is somewhat surprising that the big retailers would neglect to target holiday terms such as this in order to cash in on this growth.
As with my last post about “christmas presents”, it was clear that, while organic search was neglected, PPC for these terms was being conducted by a few of the big retailers (M&S, Apple, Earnest Jones), and again, a few are in on it with “valentines day”. M&S (Mark’s and Spencer’s) have once again opted for PPC along with interflora, Aldi (supermarket) and easyjet. While some people mentioned in the comments for my last post that these retailers probably opted for PPC due to the fact that in order to achieve high rankings for a seasonal term such as “valentines day” or “christmas presents”, you would have to maintain a page on your site for these offerings, even outwith the seasonal timeframe.
This is a valid point, however, given the cost per click for these terms (highly competitive remember), Rand’s own analysis of the success of PPC vs SEO, and the relative frequency of “Special Offers” pages, wouldn’t it be more beneficial to simply maintain seasonal holiday pages under this main heading and reap the search rewards?
There are a number of companies in particular that would probably significantly benefit from this approach, in particular, businesses involved in the typical gift sectors such as flowers (interflora, flowers direct), chocolates (Thorntons, Green & Blacks), lingerie (Agent Provocature, Ann Summers), jewellery (Earnest Jones, H.S. Samuel) etc.
A number of these sites already have Valentines Day specific pages on them, yet none rank in the top 20 for the highly searched term “valentines day”, despite the fact that this is probably one of the biggest “celebration days” for these businesses in terms of sales.
Even with the average valentines day gift spend predicted to decline due to the current economic climate (reports I have seen suggest an average spend of £72, down from £92), there is still likely to be a large amount of money being left on the online table.
So is this a missed opportunity for retailers, particularly during difficult times?








